Does anyone have an experience or input on these two blasters? Is any particularly better than the other?
It seems in the airsoft version people recommend the JAG/AA version more.
No experience with either but am keen to know which is better 
emg higher quality from my experience
So im going entirely off the 2011 series i did reviews on the old forum years ago but If they are anything like the first ones they did the jag is going to have a heavier lower and lighter slide and the emg is going to be slide heavy.
I guess u could say the emg feels higher quality but mine has lived in a draw since i bought it and used the jag far more. If you are looking to replace any parts or do upgrades or repairs the emg is mostly compatible with tm parts but u wont be able to change the blowback housing without modiforcation and may run into issues with recoil springs. if chanhing the nozzle the barrel holdy bit will need to be changed to fit the nozzle.
While the jag should be drop in and go to town for replacement parts and upgrade. I have had the cosmetic hammers break on my jag but if they have solved that issue happy days
2 Likes
I have the EMG Pit Viper and the AA Sand Viper. I rate the AA blaster as better than the EMG. The AA comes with higher quality steel components in the main wear items like trigger and hammer.
It doesn’t have full auto which is a bonus. The full auto feature on the EMG versions is not consistent with the real steel item and is janky in its operation.
The only thing AA did that I don’t like is make the slide longer than the Pit/Sand Viper should be but it’s hardly noticeable really. Considering the better build of the AA blaster I can live with the longer slide and would be happy to swap out my EMG Pit Viper for a AA version if anyone wants the full auto option.
1 Like