Again, a huge thanks to AKGelblaster, GelballNobody/ RokSolid, Maiphut and BME for the very generous gift of a XYL APC9K SMG blaster.
What a unit… blown away.
I won’t reinvent the wheel here, Rok’s covered all the mods and how-to stuff on the GelballNobody Youtube channel… if you haven’t seen it, where’ve you been? ![]()
I thought this may be interesting to those of you that are a little nervous about opening up a gearbox and tackling all the internal mods that Rok’s demonstrated on that particular video. I plan to do just that early next week during some free downtime, but I was keen to see how this blaster performed with stock internals and standard airseal with just a longer barrel and hop up and a spring change.
Wow… very surprising results. Keep in mind Rok’s Youtube results were post-mod with much improved airseal and compression due to a better nozzle, piston head and full metal rack piston, short stroking by removing teeth from the release side of the sector, etc. All springs used during the following tests were the same as Rok’s springs.
Here’s the average chrono results with stock internals :
A/T Greens
Standard spring : 210FPS
JG spring : 235FPS
M100 spring : 280FPS
With iHobby UltraHards
Standard spring : 225FPS
JG spring. : 255FPS
M100 spring : 300FPS (!
!)
Very impressive… seing the chrono hit 300 was a real surprise. As Rok suggests changing the nylon rack piston over to a full metal is recommended, which means opening up the box, so while you’re in there you might as well do the airseal upgrades and run a lighter spring for the sake of longevity.
The stock motor does struggle a little pulling that M100, but a motor swap or even just a drop back in piston spring and it chooches nocely on a 7.4v Turnigy
If you really don’t want to go as far as the internal mods, swapping over to an M85 or M90 spring is as easy as or maybe even easier than a spring change on an M4 and will give great FPS returns and still not overstress the stock internals. The longer barrel and hopup make it accurate too, even when you’re up near the high 200s.
The only criticism I could make is that the rear iron sight is about 5mm too high at it’s lowest adjustment to cowitness with the front… but that’s being picky… and certainly no biggie, I shortened mine to prevent OCD overload.
Recommendation? Get one… great blasters, they do not disappoint. ![]()
You don’t see too many short barrelled CQB units as compact as this giving such good performance gains from so little modification. ![]()
