Hanke M97 Shotgun Gel Blaster Review

Seems odd reviewing such an old blaster and this won’t be anything new to most of us here, but might be handy info for some of our members new to the hobby. It took me five years to get one, and honestly I’m wondering why it took me so long.

This has to be the market’s cheapest and easist blaster to buy and upgrade. Hanke M97, been around for years. It was a good performer back in the day, and is still up there with minimal upgrading.

The unit itself will set you back around the $100 mark, give or take, Vipertac are currently selling them for $99. Stock performance is around 250-260FPS but an outlay of about $15 for an M120 spring, ten minutes work on the bench and you’re in 300FPS territory with no lipo batteries, gas refills or stripped nylon gears to worry about.

If you’re like me and put accuracy over FPS, another $20 will get you a longer inner barrel, the stock one doesn’t allow for a hopup. No shell mods required for the barrel swap, just pull the OEM barrel out of the fitting at the nozzle end, press it onto your new barrel and trim to desired length.

Screenshot_20250211_164805_YouTube~2

I found a $15 11mm hopup a perfect neat fit inside the removable barrel cap. There is a section in the bore of the cap that’s 9.5mm so I ratted that out with a round file to allow the hopup to sit well back and out of sight. Not necessary, just personal preference.

The 20 gel capacity hopper is a bit inconvenient, so a faux optic / hopper from a Sig Sauer hopper fed P226 does the job nicely for me.

It requires dremelling another hole in the top picatinny rail slightly forward of the original, but gives you a capacity of over 100 gels. Not exactly stellar but more than adequate for a manual pump action springer. The Sig hopper can be removed and a functional optic fitted too, handy with this blaster’s accuracy. Gels can be loaded through the original rear sight fill port with an optic fitted as normal.

Performance wise, upgrade the spring and 300+FPS is easily acheivable without overstressing the cocking mechanism. Accuracy without a hopup is surprisingly good, but with a dialled in hopup it’s laser accurate. With a red dot fitted I saw the tightest grouping I’ve seen out a a gel blaster at 18-20 metres range, gels were almost stacking on top of each other at times… even more impressive when you consider cocking it takes you off target, which you then have to reacquire.

Fitting an o ring between the inner barrel and the plastic collar will help keep shots to single gels, fast pumping also will. But pumping the action slower or holding it open for a second or two will give you two or three gel shots, at lower FPS obviously.

The overall nylon build is good, and although the pump handle is ABS and feels cheap the cocking is positive and solid. Removing the rear threaded plug allows fitment of a buffer tube and stock but as the thread is clamshell by design, it does seem to be picky about which buffer tubes fit tightly enough to be functional.

It’s definitely worth a look if you’re looking for a low cost low maintenance backyard plinker, or a good performer for a backup blaster for gameplay.

Total costs including the base blaster and upgrade parts should come in around $140. Sure, you could pick up a cheap AEG for that, but factor in magazines, batteries and maintenance and the cost of an AEG goes up. My local seller brought in 40+ units of the Hanke M97s about a month or so ago and sold the lot in about four weeks, so clearly they’re still popular.

Dropping FPS with a lighter spring would also make it very viable as a kid’s blaster. About the only upgrade I’d like now is a nylon pump handle. 3D printed ones are available but PLA wouldn’t be my material of choice.

Here’s a link to Low Guido’s review and teardown from all those years ago…

1 Like

Still the best “sniper” in gel ball!
Great value plinker, still see them used at fields quite a bit

1 Like

weird about the hop up, I picked up an m97 hop up from tac edge for $2 on sale and it fits and works fine.

I still havnt got around to installing the m130 spring which x-force said the m97 would be able to handle. all the research I did prior to purchasing the m130 was saying the m120 would be the best option,

maybe if I can finish fixing that LH m1911 Vietnam springer pistol I’ll give the m97 a crack at upgrading the spring but I think I’ll get an m120 for it, rather not push my luck with the m130

Thanks for the reveiw, was musing to get one tho i wonder if there is any way to mod the internal hopper to hold more gels.

Now… put a sniper scope on it! download (4)

1 Like

Yeah, I’ve been wondering about that too, because as @RokSolid said, it’s the best sniper out there. It’d be good to increase the internal capacity just a bit and run a scope on it to take advantage of the accuracy .

Easy enough to take out the bottom of the feedtube but it would need a piece inserted near the nozzle to stop the gels jamming up.

Might look into that today. :man_shrugging:

@7mm now that’s a cool unit. :+1:

The M97’s been together and apart a few times today… happy to report that none of the tiny self tapping screws have stripped out… yet. :laughing:

I tried placing an o ring between the inner barrel and the collar to limit firing to single shot. That didn’t do much at all, so more trialling of different methods required there… maybe counterboring the end of the collar for an o ring and having it closer to the nozzle will make a difference. Stopping multiple gels from getting anywhere near the collar seems like a logical approach to solving the problem. :man_shrugging:

It is a shottie, after all… so multiple gels make sense and sure it’s intentional by design. But firing a single gel would take best advantage of it’s good accuracy in a one shot sniper application.

While it was apart I did take the opertunity to remove the horrendous flashing that is pretty much all around the shell on both halves with a Stanley blade. A satisfying job, feels like a higher quality item now and looks much better. :+1:

1 Like

Last post on this topic…

Best solution I’ve found to stop multi-gel feeding in these things…

The problem is the plastic collar on the nozzle end of the inner barrel has the same ID of 7.5mm, so any gel around 7.3mm will roll in and through creating space for a second or third gel in the collar. If you pump with the blaster pointing downward the gel will roll out the blaster. Most other gel blaster t pieces are slightly less than 7.5mm where the gels seat to prevent gel rollout and get a positive seal.

The simplest fix for me was to use a 6mm long piece of 7.3mm alloy barrel with a reducing crimp put in it to take it down in diamter a bit, closer to about 7.0mm. That goes into the collar first, then the 7.5mm barrel with a dab of glue to secure it.

Works like a champion, just put about 50 gels through it and no double fedding or rollout at all. The trade off is you lose the scattergun option, but I’ll call that a win. :+1:

Post edit : took off the pump handle and filled all the dead space with gap sealant… No More Gaps. Takes the ABS tackiness out of it, makes it feel more like nylon and puts a little more weight into the front.

Just to add to the Hanke-Panky,

They also released a full length shoulder stock, some time ago…

Its Very light , but could be filled in with no more gaps to make it heavier.
Also, the right side has screw holes, which look kinda ugly…but once again could be filled…

The left side is all clean, though…

Not bad, if you like the synthetic stock look…

do you know if anywhere still stocks the full length stocks?

couldn’t find any results on google

I’m not sure…
Try the usual suspects…ihobby, xforce, tacedge…

I got mine ages ago, so you might be out of luck…

anyone chasing one may have to try the 3d printed route then, cheers anyway

@BME do you think this would fit or could be made to fit?

To be honest, I wouldn’t know, without seeing it in the flesh.

I suspect not (readily) , as it has to fit onto the plastic grip housing.

You’d be better off , looking for a 2nd hand APS gas shottie…

@shadow187 that wooden stock definitely would not fit on a Hanke not without a ton of fettling… and even then, probably not… which is probably just as well, because then you’d have to go wood on the pump grip too. :joy:

I can tell you I tried to chase up one of those Hanke fixed stocks through iHobby very recently… not available, the unit’s just too old and nobody has any stock.

@BME looks good. :+1:yeah, you could easily plug those screw holes and paint that stock up… would look heaps better. Maybe run a layer or two of gap sealant to the inside too like you said. Make it feel less hollow and more solid.

Let’s face it, once you upgrade it, it won’t need to come apart again. :+1:

I might have one in the cupboard

1 Like

Did the Hanke-Panky on mine…

Getting it apart is easy, but getting it back together, 1 handed, with that big new spring in it, flexing outwards on everything, took some doing…

But, back in one piece now.

I put in a 7.5mm barrel in, with some tape around the base, to hold it in tight, against the seal…

Getting 270-280 fps, when it single fires, which is a little dissapointing.

Also, still double feeding.

The xforce pinkies explode when fired, too much power for them now.

Running wet goats balls…maybe they are a smaller diameter for the larger barrel.

We;ll see what 2morrow brings, i cant be arsed looking at it anymore tonight…

(goes to try one last different batch of gels…)

You need to run bigger gels in it. Try your XTac Booms.

Any of the 7.3ish hard gels are too small and you’ll see a drop in FPS. WI Heavy Milkies work well in mine with no splatter, so your pinks should be fine in it. I put some oranges through it around at Oz Gel & Testicle the other day, was punching holes through carboard boxes and hitting around 300 on his chrono.

On your double feeding issue…

Put a choke in it like I did. From my previous post just up there :point_up_2:

Huh that’s odd, I run those through most of my blasters and they run fine even on my DB AK that gets up to 380 fps, thou I do find they have too much flex on the higher end so aren’t as accurate.