anyone know what the name for the motor connectors are I’m replacing the wiring in my wells
I’m guessing it the female spade connector but I wanted to double check
thanks
Yeah spade connectors are what you’d be looking for 
1 Like
Taken from a facebook group. In the post, he stated expect losses in the 3-5% range.
1 Like
Are you sure that chart is based off gel blaster information?, because in the a/s world the “m” rating is how fast you can expect it to shoot in m/s out of a 6mm barrel but because we used 7.3-5mm barrels it should shoot slower because more volume and whatever or is it too insignificant to matter?
I wish ssrotel was here because he had experience with this, but in an arp9 with an ldx expert and an ldt tpiece, which cylinder head should I use? apache is giving me el big aids
1 Like
A/s is usually operating at higher v/e than us too, so I’d be expecting everything to remain within a relatively close margin.
I was getting the 3% results on a m90 back when I’d use them
From many of my old previous builds…… the numbers are looking quite on point right through to the M120 spring FPS expected results at the various percentages, but from there, they seem to start seeming to stray away from what is possible in a gel blaster.
I had built SSG blasters with good quality gearbox internals which ran M150 and above springs, but they definitely didn’t get anywhere further than 430-450 FPS no matter what barrel sizes were used or fitting even higher rated springs…… that just seemed like the end point for any SSG AEG Blaster could physically produce, no matter what parts could be fitted.
There may be others here that were able to do better…… but I certainly haven’t ever seen anything get above those results? 
At any point, 280-300 is the most ideal and accurate FPS that any blaster performs best at anyways, so more than that it really just a waste of time and money 
iirc he used a wells head, but that may be very wrong, only going on what I remember and then that might have been for something else he had. Another downfall for what happened…
3 Likes
Yeah I think that was the one thanks
1 Like
Was taken from a gelsoft facebook group. There was the impression the poster created the chart.
If it is accurate, its a decent tool for us less experienced folk to estimate seal efficiency.
Does anyone remember witch gen 8s had semi auto
1 Like
M4SS, mosfet/switch driven?
3 Likes
Yup, was actually the very last model M4A1 V8 full nylon receiver/gearbox Gen8’s that actually had a functional semi auto selector switch.
I had all the earlier model JinMing blasters with ABS Plastic that had only the safe/full auto useless selectors, but the V8 model actually functioned as intended
The STD HK 416 and M4SS were way ahead of their time and were the very first Blasters to be fitted with fully functional mag priming and MOSFET controlled FCU’s 
Hence STD were my favourite manufacturers for many years.
If you can find an old M4A1 V8 Gen8, you will get a fully functional safe/semi/auto fire selector 
1 Like
Thanks for the help Bob!
Anyone run one of these scopes. Not intending to use it a sight, just as a tool to identify foe when they are outside blaster range. Like it because it has a pic rail on the tube
Hey all, hope everyone is doing well!
I’m looking to make my own L1A1 SLR gel blaster based off a gen 8 (because I’m poor) and I need to know how to make a gen 8 gearbox semi-auto (either only semi-auto or a switch between full-auto and semi-auto). What would I need to get this done? Would an SKD glock 18 MOSFET work? what about a AUG or Vector MOSFET?
Any help would be appreciated, Cheers.
https://www.monkeemods.com/wbb/optics-sights/zoom-scope/hw-vortex-v3xm-3x-magnifier.html you could use one of these folds out of the way tho is fixed 3x but ur honnestly paying for clarity of its glass. the glass on the sight u linked is dogshit and blurry but if thats ur price range its aight i guess can zoom tho so plus and cons
Hey, I don’t mean to be rude, but I’m not sure that would fit and look right in an SLR as the gen 8 is made for m4s and MP5s and stuff, I think it would probably be better if you used a j11/j12 gearbox as they are roughly a V3 and v3s are used in the SLR blasters already, plus the j11/j12 gearbox already has mechanical semi auto!
2 Likes
Opinions on bf mac 10 vs mp7?
Leaning towards mp7. Looks better, can get a drum. Not sure how much spring it can handle though, spring retainer looks cheap.
Or maybe just forgo an stick with a p90, which is on order somewhere over the ocean.
Need another to add to my collection, currently in love with bullpup/cqb type blasters.
1 Like